Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:36

What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Pregnant women warned against using weight-loss jabs - BBC
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why is Nickelback known to be a bad band?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Mya Lesnar, Daughter of WWE Star Brock, Wins 2025 NCAA Shot Put Championship - Bleacher Report
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
FDA Gives Tomato Recall Over Salmonella Highest Risk Warning - TODAY.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are the pros and cons of living in Male, Maldives?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.